An argument is a statement or group of statements called premises intended to determine the degree of truth or acceptability of another statement called conclusion. Arguments can be studied from three main perspectives: the logical, the dialectical and the rhetorical perspective. In logic, an argument is usually expressed not in natural language but in a symbolic formal language, and it can be defined as any group of propositions of which one is claimed to follow from the others through deductively valid inferences that preserve truth from the premises to the conclusion. This logical perspective on argument is relevant for scientific fields such as mathematics and computer science. Logic is the study of the forms of reasoning in arguments and the development of standards and criteria to evaluate arguments. Deductive arguments can be valid, and the valid ones can be sound: in a valid argument, premisses necessitate the conclusion, even if one or more of the premises is false and the conclusion is false; in a sound argument, true premises necessitate a true conclusion. Inductive arguments, by contrast, can have different degrees of logical strength: the stronger or more cogent the argument, the greater the probability that the conclusion is true, the weaker the argument, the lesser that probability. The standards for evaluating non-deductive arguments may rest on different or additional criteria than truth—for example, the persuasiveness of so-called "indispensability claims" in transcendental arguments, the quality of hypotheses in retroduction, or even the disclosure of new possibilities for thinking and acting. In dialectics, and also in a more colloquial sense, an argument can be conceived as a social and verbal means of trying to resolve, or at least contend with, a conflict or difference of opinion that has arisen or exists between two or more parties. For the rhetorical perspective, the argument is constitutively linked with the context, in particular with the time and place in which the argument is located. From this perspective, the argument is evaluated not just by two parties (as in a dialectical approach) but also by an audience. In both dialectic and rhetoric, arguments are used not through a formal but through natural language. Since classical antiquity, philosophers and rhetoricians have developed lists of argument types in which premises and conclusions are connected in informal and defeasible ways. (Wikipedia).
It's not easy to win an argument, but if you follow these step's you will prevail. This information is based off of psychology principle's and law enforcement manuals. The article can be found here http://bit.ly/bi503e
From playlist Psychology Tutorials
How To Argue With Your Partner
It isn’t realistic to aim never to argue with our partners; far better to learn how to argue fruitfully and well. This has a lot to do with allowing ourselves to be vulnerable. If you like our films, take a look at our shop (we ship worldwide): https://goo.gl/w23EEm Join our mailing list:
From playlist RELATIONSHIPS
How To Outsmart Your Opponent In An Argument
5 Steps To Win Any Argument Join our online training course Charisma University: https://www.charismaoncommand.com/c-university/ In this video I’m going to tell you how to win any argument. And I have years of training as a logician as a philosopher here, I can mangle people in debates
From playlist Excellent Debaters
Michael Shermer - Atheism's Best Arguments?
Free access Closer to Truth's library of 5,000 videos: http://bit.ly/2UufzC7 Atheism fields two kinds of arguments denying the existence of God: arguments that refute so-called 'proofs' of God's existence and arguments that affirmatively support the truth claims of atheism. This first see
From playlist Atheism's Best Arguments? - CTT Interview Series
The Difference Between an Expression and an Equation
This video explains the difference between an expression and an equation. Site: http://mathispower4u.com Blog: http://mathispower4u.wordpress.com
From playlist Introduction to Linear Equations in One Variable
Part I: Making an Argument - Introduction to College Writing Series
Learn more about Caltech's Hixon Writing Center: http://writing.caltech.edu This video is part of Caltech's "Introduction to College Writing Series." See all videos in the series: http://bit.ly/1KEhcPj Produced in association with Caltech Academic Media Technologies. ©2015 California In
From playlist Courses and Series
The idea of ‘atonement’ sounds very old-fashioned and is deeply rooted in religious tradition. To atone means, in essence, to acknowledge one’s capacity for wrongness and one’s readiness for apology and desire for change. It’s a concept that every society needs at its center. For gifts and
From playlist RELATIONSHIPS
Ch. 8 - Logic - Valid Arguments (IB Math Studies)
Hello and welcome to What Da Math This video is an explanation of the following terms from logic, chapter 8: Valid arguments and truth tables using implications and conjunctions SUBSCRIBE for more math and math studies videos Join me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/WhatDaMath
From playlist IB Math Studies Chapter 8
From playlist e. Sets and Logic
From playlist Computing for Data Analysis (Roger Peng)
1. Ch. 1 (Part 1/3) Introduction to Logic, Philosophy 10, UC San Diego - BSLIF
Video lecture corresponding to _Basic Sentential Logic and Informal Fallacies_, Introduction, and Chapter 1, Part 1 of 3. This is for the class Introduction to Logic, Philosophy 10, UC San Diego.
From playlist UC San Diego: PHIL 10 - Introduction to Logic | CosmoLearning.org Philosophy
Live CEOing Ep 357: Language Design in Wolfram Language [ValueQ & ValidArgumentsQ]
In this episode of Live CEOing, Stephen Wolfram discusses the design of ValueQ and ValidArgumentsQ for the Wolfram Language. If you'd like to contribute to the discussion in future episodes, you can participate through this YouTube channel or through the official Twitch channel of Stephen
From playlist Behind the Scenes in Real-Life Software Design
CRITICAL THINKING - Fundamentals: Introduction to Critical Thinking [HD]
Geoff Pynn (Northern Illinois University) gets you started on the critical thinking journey. He tells you what critical thinking is, what an argument is, and what the difference between a deductive and an ampliative argument is. Help us caption & translate this video! http://amara.org/v/
From playlist More
Function arguments in detail - Advanced Python 18 - Programming Tutorial
In this Python Advanced Tutorial, I will talk about function arguments in detail. This video will cover: - The difference between arguments and parameters - Positional and keyword arguments - Default arguments - Variable-length arguments (*args and **kwargs) - Container unpacking into fun
From playlist Advanced Python - Complete Course
Keep Ruby Weird 2018 - Keynote by Yukihiro Matsumoto 'Matz'
Keep Ruby Weird 2018 - Keynote by Yukihiro Matsumoto 'Matz'
From playlist Keep Ruby Weird 2018
Assembly Calling Conventions For Reverse Engineers [Patreon Unlocked]
A practical look at x86 calling conventions from a reverse engineering perspective. We take a look at __cdecl __stdcall __fastcall __thiscall Full Patreon tutorial (with examples): https://www.patreon.com/posts/62676631 ----- OALABS DISCORD https://discord.gg/6h5Bh5AMDU OALABS PATREON h
From playlist Patreon Unlocked
This first E-Lecture on Predicate Logic is meant as a gentle introduction. It first points out why propositional logic alone is not sufficient for the formalization of sentence meaning and then introduces the central machinery of predicate logic using several examples with which the studen
From playlist VLC103 - The Nature of Meaning
Incentives, Inequality, & Community - G. A. Cohen (1991)
Gerald Cohen gives the first of two Tanner lectures. 00:00 The Talk 59:59 Q&A #Philosophy #PoliticalPhilosophy
From playlist Social & Political Philosophy
Alister McGrath - Atheism's Best Arguments?
Free access Closer to Truth's library of 5,000 videos: http://bit.ly/2UufzC7 Atheism fields two kinds of arguments denying the existence of God: arguments that refute so-called 'proofs' of God's existence and arguments that affirmatively support the truth claims of atheism. This first see
From playlist Atheism's Best Arguments? - CTT Interview Series
A Defense of Classical Theology (Part 1): The New Atheism and the Cosmological Arguments
In part 1, I will go over the major misconceptions of the cosmological arguments promulgated by the likes of popular atheists such as Daniel Dennett, Sam Harris, Christopher Hitchens, and Richard Dawkins. We’ll conclude that their objections, which are also the most common ones in popular
From playlist Theology